Wednesday, December 22, 2010

AN EXTRAVAGANT "GIFT"? FROM OUR POLITICIANS

It is very clear to me that the long term costs of our growing national debt is far more damaging than the short-term cost of our economic sluggishness. But our government has approved another federal stimulus package that will force us to add $838 billion to our $14 trillion debt. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans made any attempt to cut spending to help pay for it. Instead, they tacked on pet projects and “gifts” for lobbyist such as a tax break for the Rum distilleries. The tax cut deal made by President Obama and the Republican congressional leaders was blatantly irresponsible. If they had trimmed $56 billion from the vast federal budget to pay for extended jobless benefits, that would have made sense. And, if they had made some other spending cuts to pay for continuing the Bush era tax cuts that would have been good. But no, the same people who were voicing concern about the red ink just weeks ago went ahead and, with a shocking and shameful disregard for the reality of our economic situation, spent money we do not have.

Obama calls it a tax cut deal but in reality it was an agreement to not increase taxes by continuing the cuts already put in place by Bush. In itself, that was a good move but they forgot to balance their budget and cut spending. What the government gives, it must ultimately take away from its citizens. A day of reckoning is coming. Our citizens are going to have to pay for what these politicians are giving away. We need to stop them before our country goes bankrupt!

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO EVERYONE EXCEPT THE POLITICIANS. TO THEM I SAY, “BAH HUMBUG!!!! GIVE THEM A LUMP OF COAL."

1 comment:

  1. Dear 'Lance:
    When you intro'd using the term "irresponsible politicians" I thought you were being ironic with the use of this redundancy. Now I see you were only emphasizing the obvious.
    But, here's the rub: Politicians today are merely doing what they've always done, serve their constituency. What's wrong with that? Oh, yeah, I forgot. They've redefined what the term means. A constituent is no longer a voter, it is now a donor.
    This is why the furor over the census and redistricting (nee gerrymandering) is wasted energy. Politicians no longer serve those in physical locations, they serve those who give them the most money regardless of where it comes from.
    Happy holidays to you and your readers,
    TsarPat

    ReplyDelete