Universal coverage provided by the government is a bad idea. For reasons, look at the systems provided by other countries such as, Canada and Sweden. Common characteristics are long waiting time periods before you can get poor service. Some reform of our current system is needed concerning the cost of care. Measured by the percentage of GNP, The U. S. spends more on health care than any other country in the world. We have a blended system of government provided benefits for the poor and the elderly (Medicare & Medicaid) and health services and insurance that is available in a free enterprise market. Not perfect, but it functions pretty darn well. The major problem we have is the escalating cost of benefits and services. My remedy for this problem is to tweak the system by changing how benefits and insurance are paid for. Currently, they are provided, primarily, by employers. The individual has no incentive to ask questions like: Do I really need this test or this service? How much does this cost? Can I get it for less through another provider? Instead, the individual thinks, (erroneously) "I don't have to pay for it so give me everything and I do not care what it cost!" Thus, we lose the powerful advantage of free enterprise. It's called competition!
Let's not lose sight of the fact that no system will be perfect. Also, let's remember the ancient truth that the poor will always be with us. And, therefore, the uninsured will always be with us. These problems will be mitigated by charitable individuals and faith based groups who have a societal responsibility for unfortunate people.
The Freelance Thinker
No comments:
Post a Comment